North American trade is no longer being shaped by tariffs alone. For years, boardroom discussions treated the USMCA as a straightforward trade agreement—a technical framework covering tariffs, rules of origin, and labor provisions. That era is over. With the 2026 joint review now underway, North America’s trade architecture is increasingly becoming a tool for geopolitical alignment, economic security, and stronger, more resilient supply chains.
At the center of this shift is China. Its growing role in nearshoring has become one of the main sources of friction between Mexico, the United States, and Canada. What was originally designed as a routine six-year administrative review is now taking on the characteristics of a de facto renegotiation, as Washington seeks to close any loopholes that could allow China-linked manufacturing to access the U.S. market tariff-free through operations in Mexico.
To illustrate the impact of these developments, the following table outlines the trade metrics and tariff tools that are redefining the playing field during the 2025–2026 period:
|
North American Trade and Manufacturing Indicator |
Recorded Value / Recent Trend (2025–2026) |
Implication for the USMCA |
|
Trade in manufactured goods between Mexico and the United States |
$791 billion in 2025. |
Consolidation of regional manufacturing interdependence. |
|
Mexican exports of computing equipment (HS 8471) |
More than $85 billion in 2025. |
Doubled in one year, driven by servers and data center components. |
|
Regional content share in the transportation sector |
77 cents of every dollar exported from Mexico. |
Deep physical integration across the automotive parts and assembly sectors. |
|
U.S. IEEPA tariff |
Suspended on February 24, 2026, by order of the Supreme Court. |
Loss of the White House’s direct executive pathway for imposing tariffs. |
|
U.S. Section 122 Emergency Tariff |
Temporary application of a 10% ad valorem tariff in February 2026. |
Immediate replacement of the IEEPA mechanism and a major incentive for USMCA compliance. |
Sources: Brookings Institution / CSIS / Baker Institute
As Washington increases customs oversight, reviewing public compliance records alone is no longer enough. U.S. trade and customs authorities now expect companies seeking USMCA tariff benefits to clearly show where their materials come from and how their supply chains operate.
Financial institutions, investment funds, and business partners must conduct advanced due diligence investigations to determine whether manufacturing operations in Mexico represent genuine North American production platforms or whether they conceal triangulation structures and dependencies involving Chinese state-owned corporations.
This process requires looking beyond the different corporate layers to thoroughly verify critical aspects of the operation:
The financial and legal cost of failing to conduct this advanced analysis can be extremely high, exposing investors to the termination of supply contracts, federal investigations for customs fraud under U.S. law, and the physical detention or seizure of goods at U.S. customs facilities.
Do not leave the future of your operations to chance at the renegotiation table. Download the complete report, “USMCA 2026: What Executives Need to Know (Before Everyone Else),” today and prepare your company to lead under North America’s new trade rules.
Trade triangulation occurs when goods, components, or investments originating in one country are routed through a second country to obtain improved market access or to navigate trade restrictions. In North America, scrutiny often focuses on situations where products associated with China are processed or assembled in Mexico before entering the United States.
Rules of origin define the country in which a product is considered to have been manufactured. Under the USMCA, companies must comply with specific regional content, transformation, and sourcing criteria to qualify for preferential tariff treatment.
USMCA tariff benefits provide reduced or zero tariffs for eligible goods traded among Mexico, the United States, and Canada. To access these benefits, companies must maintain and present documentation demonstrating compliance with the agreement’s origin and production requirements.
Supply chain traceability refers to the capacity to identify, document, and follow the origin of materials and components, as well as their movement and transformation throughout the production process. Strong traceability supports compliance with USMCA rules and facilitates customs verification processes.
Companies should maintain clear documentation showing where their materials and components come from, how their products are manufactured, and how their supply chains operate. This helps demonstrate that their goods meet USMCA requirements.
Not always. Public records provide useful information, but companies may also need to verify ownership, financing, suppliers, logistics, and the origin of key components to fully understand the risks behind an operation.
No. Chinese investment or suppliers do not automatically mean that a company is violating trade rules. The main concern is whether the operation can clearly prove its ownership, sourcing, production activity, and compliance with USMCA rules.
Executives should review who ultimately owns or controls the business, where the project’s financing comes from, where production components originate, and whether the company’s logistics and local business relationships are transparent.
A lack of documentation or transparency may lead to customs reviews, supply contract problems, investigations, or the detention of goods at the border. Strong due diligence can help reduce these legal, financial, and operational risks.